<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sloppy Focus in Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sloppy-focus-in-windows</link>
	<description>Rated arrrr for Piracy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 03:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puyan Lotfi</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-23136</link>
		<dc:creator>Puyan Lotfi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-23136</guid>
		<description>This is almost awesome. Like the previous poster said, this is FocusFollowsMouse. Also I found that in windows 7 this breaks the Windows Key-Arrow shortcuts for Aero Snap: the focus after a aero snap will be whatever window/desktop the cursor is over and not whatever window you are in the process of trying to move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is almost awesome. Like the previous poster said, this is FocusFollowsMouse. Also I found that in windows 7 this breaks the Windows Key-Arrow shortcuts for Aero Snap: the focus after a aero snap will be whatever window/desktop the cursor is over and not whatever window you are in the process of trying to move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pearce</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-22041</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-22041</guid>
		<description>This is also a feature of TweakUI (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx) released by MS for WinXP. Mouse -&gt; X-Mouse -&gt; Activation Follows Mouse achieves this. It also has a setting for auto-raising the window, which is the feature your are missing with the reg tweak :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is also a feature of TweakUI (<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/powertoys/xppowertoys.mspx</a>) released by MS for WinXP. Mouse -&gt; X-Mouse -&gt; Activation Follows Mouse achieves this. It also has a setting for auto-raising the window, which is the feature your are missing with the reg tweak <img src='http://bogomip.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kzslim</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-22037</link>
		<dc:creator>kzslim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-22037</guid>
		<description>Great.  It works on Windows7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  It works on Windows7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicher Minnaard</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17819</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicher Minnaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17819</guid>
		<description>@Tomas: 
Well, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_%28computing%29#Sloppy_focus&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~ahiorean/ahwm/sloppy-focus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this informative page&lt;/a&gt;, this &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; sloppy focus. If you move out of some window and over to your desktop background, you don&#039;t lose input focus of said window.

But it does not allow you to scroll in an inactive window, which is a killer feature indeed. I&#039;ve just finished &lt;a href=&quot;http://smorgasbord.gavagai.nl/2009/12/windowsmac-focus-models-and-copy-pasting-doing-it-wrong-both-of-you/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a blogpost&lt;/a&gt; on this subject and some other things in which X11 (and its window managers) positively stack up against Windows and OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tomas:<br />
Well, according to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_%28computing%29#Sloppy_focus" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> and <a href="http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~ahiorean/ahwm/sloppy-focus.html" rel="nofollow">this informative page</a>, this <b>is</b> sloppy focus. If you move out of some window and over to your desktop background, you don't lose input focus of said window.</p>
<p>But it does not allow you to scroll in an inactive window, which is a killer feature indeed. I've just finished <a href="http://smorgasbord.gavagai.nl/2009/12/windowsmac-focus-models-and-copy-pasting-doing-it-wrong-both-of-you/" rel="nofollow">a blogpost</a> on this subject and some other things in which X11 (and its window managers) positively stack up against Windows and OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord &#187; Windows/Mac focus models and copy-pasting: Doing it wrong, both of you</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17818</link>
		<dc:creator>SmÃ¶rgÃ¥sbord &#187; Windows/Mac focus models and copy-pasting: Doing it wrong, both of you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17818</guid>
		<description>[...] Windows 95 and it appears it still works. You can have crude &#8217;sloppy focus&#8217; on Windows. Just hex-edit your UserPreferencesMask in the Registry (Half of the times that I&#8217;m doing anything remotely interesting on Windows, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Windows 95 and it appears it still works. You can have crude &#8217;sloppy focus&#8217; on Windows. Just hex-edit your UserPreferencesMask in the Registry (Half of the times that I&#8217;m doing anything remotely interesting on Windows, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17811</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 03:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17811</guid>
		<description>Well this worked, kinda!
Now focus follows the mouse, but it doesn&#039;t make the windows to jump out in front.. Meaning i have to hover the mouse over a program to be able to write in it..

Meaning, this is not sloppy focus, it is FocusFollowsMouse..

Not like the linux sloppy focus where i can scroll in a window that is not active, and still keep focus on a window so i can type there!

Too bad :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this worked, kinda!<br />
Now focus follows the mouse, but it doesn't make the windows to jump out in front.. Meaning i have to hover the mouse over a program to be able to write in it..</p>
<p>Meaning, this is not sloppy focus, it is FocusFollowsMouse..</p>
<p>Not like the linux sloppy focus where i can scroll in a window that is not active, and still keep focus on a window so i can type there!</p>
<p>Too bad <img src='http://bogomip.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scurvy Jake</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17780</link>
		<dc:creator>Scurvy Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17780</guid>
		<description>It goes under the Current User section, so it won&#039;t apply to anyone else, just the user that makes the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes under the Current User section, so it won't apply to anyone else, just the user that makes the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17779</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17779</guid>
		<description>is this able to only be under one user or the whole system. other users probably would freak out. i haven&#039;t used the regestery enough to know these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this able to only be under one user or the whole system. other users probably would freak out. i haven't used the regestery enough to know these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scurvy Jake</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17626</link>
		<dc:creator>Scurvy Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17626</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying the bit issue. And the java, well, I got sick of comment spam. Would you prefer an unreadable CAPTCHA instead? I wouldn&#039;t. Plus the time it takes to generate the hash means the commenter needs to take a little time to read through what they&#039;re writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying the bit issue. And the java, well, I got sick of comment spam. Would you prefer an unreadable CAPTCHA instead? I wouldn't. Plus the time it takes to generate the hash means the commenter needs to take a little time to read through what they're writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hocevar</title>
		<link>http://bogomip.net/blog/2008/09/08/sloppy-focus-in-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-17625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hocevar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bogomip.net/blog/?p=2738#comment-17625</guid>
		<description>Your explanation is misleading: the bit needs to be set, not incremented. You must not affect any other bits of the mask while setting the sloppy focus bit.

As a sidenote, forcing me to install a Java plugin just so I can leave a comment on this blog makes me want to torture small animals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your explanation is misleading: the bit needs to be set, not incremented. You must not affect any other bits of the mask while setting the sloppy focus bit.</p>
<p>As a sidenote, forcing me to install a Java plugin just so I can leave a comment on this blog makes me want to torture small animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

